JOHN KEEL NOT AN AUTHORITY ON ANYTHING

http://preferredmode.com/2013/09/05/roberto-2/

Operation Trojan Horse has just been republished by Anomalist Books.  It’s Keel’s major statement on UFOs, and (as readers may have noticed) one of the hardest of his books to find.  So, make your way to Anomalist Books and get yourself some Keel!

The final part of the proposal for Abominable Space Things is simply headed “Descriptive.”  It sounds more like an introduction than a description; maybe it would have turned into one.  It also sounds more like Keel than Sanderson to me; see what you think.

Here you go: the last four chapters of the proposed Keel-Sanderson book, from their pitch.  From the vantage point of 1966, that was the breakthrough year.  The book proposal also included a more general section headed “Descriptive”; that will be next.

The pitch for the proposed Keel-Sanderson opus (Abominable Space Things) continues with a chapter by chapter outline.  It seems to bear the stamp of Sanderson more than Keel; John mentioned in correspondence that he wanted to keep speculation to a minimum.  But then again, John was more likely to misspell “Renaissance”; Sanderson was a better speller.  Here are the first eight chapters (of twelve), taking us up through 1948.  I’ll break it up, to keep the posts manageable.  It sounds like it would have been a lively book…

We continue with the pitch for Abominable Space Things, the proposed UFO book by John Keel and Ivan Sanderson.  Here are two pages of acknowledgements: note that both men were then on good terms with both NICAP and APRO.

So, below you’ll find the first part of the pitch for Abominable Space Things.  Keel and Sanderson specify their approach, and explain the title.  The appreciation of the word “things” is interesting, given that Sanderson went on to write books simply called Things and More Things.  The proposal also contains a section on acknowledgements, a table of contents, and a general description, which we’ll get to later.  But here’s the first part…

John wrote Ivan Sanderson again on May 2, 1966.  He was indeed corresponding regularly with the Lorenzens; and he was indeed inundated with material.  The meeting with Fawcett concerned his superhero spoof, The Fickle Finger of Fate (which has, parenthetically, puzzled some Keel fans unaware of his earlier work as a comedy writer).  He doesn’t seem to have corresponded with Isabel Davis, active in the UFO organizations CSI and NICAP.  I wonder how the meeting went…

Around this time, John was putting more work into his projected UFO article for Playboy, and the book with Sanderson sort of fizzled out.  But they did get as far as an outline/pitch, which I’ll bring you next time.

John apparently sent Ivan Sanderson a report on his meeting with Lt. Col. Maston Jacks.  I haven’t found a copy in John’s papers; but here’s Sanderson’s response to it, on April 29, 1966.  Sanderson also included a couple of clippings: one about a UFO sighting in Oklahoma City, on July 31, 1965; and one in which the astronomer Sir Bernard Lovell dismissed UFOs as “incredible nonsense.”

I’m also posting a copy of Jacks’s response to John’s letter of inquiry.  Obviously, he just wanted to give John a copy of “Project Blue Book” and make jokes about little green girls.  John found that an association with Playboy wasn’t necessarily helpful.

The correspondence continues, in a long and lively letter from Ivan Sanderson, on April 22, 1966.  He expresses his impatience with the lists of reports found in many UFO publications, and the paucity of interpretation; and dwells on some of Kenneth Arnold’s oddities, speculating that he may have been spreading disinformation.  He also enclosed a copy (quite faded now) of a letter from the unnamed “philosopher,” offering a mostly positive critique of his recent UFO talk.

I apologize in advance for Sanderson’s racist remarks in the second paragraph.  They do crop up in his letters.  I don’t condone them, but prefer to give you the letter uncensored; the rest of it is worth reading.

John was born on March 25, 1930.  He would have been 83 today; here he is when he was younger.